A firm's quality reputation reflects
the track record of the products it sells. Reputation is an important
asset as it influences the consumers' willingness to pay. When and
to what extent shold a firm use this asset to
sell additional products under the
same name? I analyze the different trade-offs of "reputation stretching''
in a formal adverse-selection model of optimal firm strategy and rational
consumer behavior.
I characterize three effects: the
direct reputation effect (high-reputation firms are paid more for a new
product); the feed-back reputation effect (high-quality firms are more
likely to strengthen their reputation by adding a new product to their
portfolio); and the signalling effect (in equilibrium, launching a new
product signals high quality to consumers). Together, these three effects
imply that a firm's propensity to stretch its reputation is increasing
in its level of reputation and in its quality level. |