THE SHIRLEY AND LESLIE PORTER CHAIR OF SEMIOTICS

The SHIRLEY AND LESLIE PORTER CHAIR OF SEMIOTICS AND THEORY OF LITERATURE was founded 1990. Professor Itamar Even-Zohar was nominated as Chair incumbent and served until October 31, 2009. Professor Zohar Shavit was nominated in November of 2009 to be the Chair’s incumbent. The Chair was renamed The Porter Chair of Semiotics and Culture Research on November 2009.

 

Chair’s Activity until October 31, 2009

The Chair has supported research carried out by Professor Itamar Even-Zohar and by his PhD and M.A students.

 

Basically, the ongoing project of Professor Itamar Even-Zohar has been the investigation of the factors governing the dynamics of heterogeneous socio-cultural systems. “Culture” in this conceptual framework is conceived of as life-management programs, not as sets of elite commodities.

 

Even-Zohar’s research has been predominantly directed to investigating the instances of deliberate culture planning in relation to the emergence, or rather the making of, new socio-political entities. Problems of majority and minority, center and periphery, which have always been part of the theoretical framework of Even-Zohar’s Polysystem theory, have now been put to test in connection with the study of the ongoing struggles for accessing and eventually controlling resources. Since the end of the 18th century, more and more communities and groups around the globe have adopted the model of self-management, more often than not bundled together with energetic endeavors to create separate culture repertoires.

 

This research has been carried out by the Chair incumbent first on the invented Hebrew culture in Palestine between 1882 and 1948. He then moved to investigating the case of Italy’s Risorgimento and the “revival” of the Italian language. Other cases had to be subsequently studied, in various degrees of depth, in order to be able to assess the validity of conclusions based on locally restricted cases. Since 1993, the Chair incumbent has been carrying out research in situ in Spanish Galicia, Catalonia, Iceland, Québec, and Newfoundland.  In the course of research, questions naturally diversified, not only because each case is evidently different as far as the local interaction between the generally used functions is concerned, but because what seemed to be the major parameters at a certain stage often turned out to be governed by other, probably more crucial and decisive ones.

 

As a consequence, the problems of culture planning and the making of entities in the context of the interplay between center and periphery have gradually geared themselves to questions about the relation between survival and success of communities, and the role of the various groups within such communities who may operate as factors of either generating wealth (in the wide sense of the term, not exclusively on the economic level) or failure. Groups traditionally called “intellectuals” and “intelligentsia” may indeed function, as research has shown, in either one of these directions. On the other hand, it has been tentatively possible to hypothesize that communities severely lacking this category of people have shown little to no capacity for change and improvement of life conditions.

 

Parts of the work done in these fields can be accessed from Even-Zohar’s Website: http://www.tau.ac.il/~itamarez.

 

Research works carried out by PhD and M.A students under the supervision of Professor Even-Zohar are listed in http://www.tau.ac.il/~itamarez/ez_vita/ma-phd.htm.