Introduction into Cluster (Proteoid)
Roots
By Philip Nemoy
Contents:
Most
of the essential elements for all life forms enter the biosphere through
bacteria or through the roots of plants (Nissen 1991),
so the study of the resource acquisition by roots is of much interest and
importance. Today the study of plant roots is a meeting point between ecology,
physiology, developmental and molecular biology - a vibrant and challenging
field.
In the study of the roots’ special adaptations for
nutrient uptake much emphasis is placed on mycorrhizas and nitrogen-fixing
nodule symbioses, whilst significantly less attention is paid to another root
adaptation, namely the cluster root.
Nearly 100 years ago, in 1894, Adolf Engler
described an unusual root morphology of plants in the family Proteaceae growing
in Leipzig Botanic Gardens. The roots were extensively branched and covered with
long densely grouped hairs. But it wasn’t until 1960 that Purnell coined the
term ‘proteoid roots’ to describe a root with “dense clusters of rootlets of
limited growth”. She observed this structure in all but one (Persoonia)
genera of the family Proteaceae, so the name ‘proteoid root’ stems from the
plant family in which it was first discovered.
Up today, proteoid roots have been reported in
Betulaceae, Casuarinaceae, Eleagnaceae, Moraceae, Leguminosae (Fabaceae) and
Myricaceae families, all of which can symbiotically fix atmospheric N2,
apart from Proteaceae that cannot (Dinkelaker et al,
1995). Because of that more recent term ‘cluster roots’ appeared to
describe an entire root (or a part of it) from any species that forms one or
more clusters of rootlets along its length.
It should be mentioned that the terms proteoid root,
cluster root and root cluster have all been used in the literature to describe
either the proteoid root axis or the clusters of rootlets themselves, so that
caution should be taken when comparing studies because the definitions may
vary.
Although there is considerable variation in cluster
root morphology between species, the general structure is as follows: along the
axis of primary or secondary root discrete clusters of closely spaced rootlets
develop. These rootlets emerge in contiguous rows and grow to reach a similar
length. This is a rare but not unique example of determinant growth in plant
roots (determinacy in lateral roots also occurs in non-proteoid plants such as
maize).
Clusters can form singly, as is commonly observed in Lupinus albus,
or as complex or compound systems, as in mat-forming members of Proteaceae.
Fig. 1: Schematic representation of Cluster Roots

A-
the simple cluster root, common in non-Proteaceae and in some members of
Proteaceae. B – a complex cluster root with a second cluster emerging from
within the first one. C – the compound cluster root, common in mat-forming
members of Proteaceae. (After Skene 1998)
Proteoid
roots of :

Lupinus albus (Fabaceae)

Hakea sp.
(Proteaceae)

Gervilea
sp. (Proteaceae)
Rootlet
final length can range from 1 to 30 mm, depending on the species, and the
length of a cluster along a proteoid root axis also varies between species (Dinkelaker et al., 1995).
It
was Purnell (1960) who for the first time suggested that proteoid roots were
involved in nutrient uptake. All species with proteoid roots can grow in soils
with poorly available nutrients, and most do not form mycorrhizal symbioses.
Species with cluster roots are also often pioneers in primary and secondary
succession, and some are used in land reclamation )Skene, 1998). So what is the significance of cluster root
structure in nutrient uptake by plant?
Proliferation
of rootlets in a cluster presents a massive increase in root surface area for
contact with soil, which is thought to be advantageous in nutrient uptake. For
example, a mature Hakea oblique proteoid root cluster has a surface area
(excluding root hairs) 25 times greater than that of an equivalent mass of
axial root.
Coupled with the
proliferation of surface area, proteoid root clusters chemically modify the
surrounding soil by exuding compounds. These compounds include carboxylate
organic anions, acid phosphatases, phenolics, mucilages, and water, and they
facilitate the mobilization of nutrients from soil. Organic anions, especially
citrate, mobilize P by chelating soil minerals such as Fe, Al, and Ca, all of
which bind P. Acid phosphatases are enzymes that hydrolyze organic forms of P.
![]()
The mechanism by which exudation of organic
acids occurs is not yet known. It has been shown experimentally that the
composition of organic anions within the tissue doesn’t reflect that of the
exudates and that the rates of exudation do not reflect tissue concentration,
indicating that the mechanism has specificity and is not driven solely by a
concentration gradients of organic anions between the root tissue and the soil.
Interestingly,
exudation in cluster roots represents a physiological clustering, akin
to the morphological clustering observed in their structure. It occurs as an
‘exudative burst’, a remarkable phenomenon wherein the rootlets exude little or
no material until fully grown, but then, over 2-3 days, exude large amounts of
citrate and malate. Following this, the level of exudation drops back to almost
zero (Dinkelaker et al. 1995). This action is supposed to be cyclical,
and there are some speculations about the nature of such adaptation: first, it
may prevent soil bacteria from completely metabolizing the exudates before it
can enhance nutrient (P) uptake; second, since phosphate has a low diffusion
coefficient, a rapid, concentrated event would be more effective than a
long-term but lower level of exudation (for review see Skene
1998). It is clear that the ‘exudative burst’ is a consequence of an
alteration in the whole plant metabolism, the details of which remain largely
unknown.
Cluster roots develop
under low P or Fe conditions, and their formation is inhibited by mineral
abundance.
The weird phenomenon
is that for almost all proteoid-root-forming species, those that respond to P
stress do not produce proteoid roots under Fe stress and vice versa, at least
for the conditions under which they have been grown (Watt
and Evans, 1999). The nature of this remains to be solved.
It has been showed
that clusters tend to form in nutrient rich [artificial] layers of organic poor
soils, such as sand dunes, suggesting than the mechanism of proteoid root
initiation depends not only on internal control within the plant, but can also respond
to a local concentrations of organic matter in the soil adjacent to the root.
For detailed
description of cluster formation see Skene, 2000.
Root developmental
biology
Cluster roots offer
an ideal experimental system to study basic elements of root development and
cell cycle control. They are predictable in terms of initiation (Skene 2000) so that it becomes possible to investigate
the root initiation process from its beginning, which remained mostly vague
until now.
Physiology
Physiological studies
on cluster roots are focused on the aspects of exudation. The use of cluster
roots provides a useful system in which to investigate control of exudation,
because of its unique temporal and spatial context. Here the questions such as:
what controls the release of exudates from plant roots and can such controls be
manipulated to improve the ability of non-cluster-forming plants to acquire
nutrients – might find their answers.
Ecophysiology
The studies of
plant-bacterial interactions are of great interest in the context of proteoid
roots. The rhizosphere of the cluster root undergoes dramatic chemical change
under the exudative burst, and the microflora within it may also change during
these events. Following the rhizosphere microbial population of proteoid roots
in the course of exudative burst (before, during and after) may give a novel
insights into microbial population response to changing resourses.
As it was mentioned
above, species with cluster roots are often pioneers in primary and secondary
succession, and important in soil stability. Their role in plant communities
deserves further study. The activity of cluster roots in mobilizing phosphate
and other nutrients may also impact other species, especially in terms of
competition and nutrient cycling.
Evolutionary Studies
The evolution of the
cluster roots and their phylogenetic distribution is interesting: the diversity
of response, together with the increasing number of families in which proteoid
roots have been observed, suggests that proteoid roots have evolved
independently . Among the Proteaceae, all species so far examined, with the
exception of one genus, Persoonia, produce cluster roots. This family is indigenous to South
Africa, South America and Australia, suggesting an ancient Gondwanan
distribution of cluster roots. All cluster-forming species except Proteaceae
form nodule symbioses with nitrogen fixing
bacteria, mycorrhizal or actinorhizal
symbioses. The association of proteoid root formation with other nutrient uptake
adaptations may be of common or separate evolutionary origin. With the
molecular phylogeny techniques available today such questions can be solved.
Biotechnology
What are the
opportunities of genetic manipulation in order to facilitate cluster root
production in species within which they are not presently produced? Unlike
mycorhizas and nitrogen fixing nodules, cluster roots aren’t dependent on other
organisms for their development. The broad phylogenetic distribution and the
conservative developmental and physiological characteristics across all
speciessuggest that there may be only a limited number of changes needed to
lead to the formation of these structures. Thus, the task of identifying the
genes underlying cluster roots development and subsequent engineering of other
species to produce them seems rather possible. And the ability to improve
phosphate and iron uptake without the addition of fertilizers makes the cluster
root a valuable biotechnological target.
To summarize ,
cluster roots are considered today , along with mycorrhizas, actinorhizas and
nitrogen-fixing nodules, one of the major adaptations of plant roots to
nutrient acquisition. This adaptation, which combines changes of both
developmental and physiological patterns of plant roots deserves further study,
which can lead to far reaching horizons in many fields of plant science.
Dinkelaker B.,
Hengeler C, Marschner H. (1995), Distribution and function of proteoid roots
and other root clusters. Bot Acta 108: 183–200.
Nissen P. (1991)
Uptake Mechanisms. In Plant
Roots: The Hidden Half
Skene K.R.(1998), Cluster
roots: some ecological considerations. Journal of Ecology 86, 1062-1066.
Skene K.R. (2000)
Pattern Formation in Cluster Roots:Some Developmental and Evolutionary
Considerations. Annals of Botany 85:901-908
Skene K.R. (2001)
Cluster Roots: Model Experimental Tools for Key Biological Problems. Journal
of Experimental Botany 52:479-485
Watt M. and Evans
J.R. (1999), Proteoid Proteoid
Roots. Physiology and Development. Plant Physiology, 121: 317–323, www.plantphysiol.org
Dr. Keith Skene’s Homepage
Environmental
Microbiology Resourse