|
ZVI ECKSTEIN |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS ZVI ECKSTEIN and OSNAT LIFSHITZ
The
Model (section 2) Data
and Estimation (section 3) PSID Data The
data is based on the PSID survey (Panel Study of Income Dynamics) during the
years 1983-1993. The yearly source files were downloaded from http://psidonline.isr.umich.edu.
From each file we kept and/or calculate the model variables, using the
following do file (create85.do). We
choose to use quarterly data which is available only from 1983 (the data is
available on a monthly frequency, and we created the quarterly data using the
do file: mon_to_q.do).
We restrict the model for the first ten years since marriage. In order to
give similar initial conditions to all individuals, we restrict the data, as
in the model, to start at the date of marriage and we consider all married
couples during the years 1983-1984. The file (PSID.dta) contains details on 863 couples and follows
them until 1993 or until they are separated. 36.3% of the couples are
divorced or separate during the sample period; 14.5% leave the sample from
other reasons, such that after 10 years 49.2% of the couples remain in the
sample. (Descriptive
statistics and reduced form estimation of the model’s equations,
including tables 1 and 2 in the paper). The
data contains individual and household demographic information and labor
supply, such as, wage, working hours, unemployment and non-participating in
the labor force. The participation rate of women in the sample is 72% in
1984, and climbs up to 79% after 10 years of marriage. Note that the
participation rate of married women, aged 25- Estimation Results (section 4)
Counterfactuals (section 5)
CPS
Data, variables and sample restriction for Figures 1 and 2 and Table 1 Data was taken from the Annual Demographic Surveys
(March CPS supplement) conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the
Bureau of the Census. This survey is the primary source for detailed
information on income and work experience in the The sample is restricted to civilian adults, ignoring armed forces and children. We divided the sample into five education groups: high school dropouts (HSD), high school graduates (HSG), individuals with some college (SC), college graduates (CG) and post-college degree holders (PC). In order to construct the education variable, until 1991 we used the years of schooling completed and added 0.5 years if the individual did not complete the highest grade attended and from 1992 we used years of schooling as is. Weekly wages are constructed by taking the previous
year’s wage and salary income and dividing it by the number of weeks
worked in the previous year. Hourly wages are defined as the weekly wage
divided by the number of hours worked in the previous week in all jobs, while
annual (annualized) wages are defined as the weekly wage multiplied by 52.
Wages are multiplied by 1.75 for top-coded observations until 1995. Nominal
wages are deflated using the Personal Consumption Expenditure (PCE) index
from NIPA table 2.3.4 (http://www.bea.gov/national/nipaweb/index.asp).
Since wages refer to the previous year, we use PCE for year X-1 for
observations in year X and therefore all wages are expressed in constant 2006
dollars. Information on number of children under six for the
period 1968 - 1975, which is missing from the survey data, is completed where
possible using the distribution of this variable in 1967 and 1976 for each
gender, marital status and cohort separately. The completed information can
be used to construct an aggregate trend, but not to identify the number of
children for a specific individual. In order to construct couples, we kept only heads of
households and spouses (i.e. no secondary families were used) and dropped
households with more than one male or more than one female. We then merged
women and men based on year and household id and dropped problematic couples
(with two heads or two spouses, with more than one family or with
inconsistent marital status or number of children). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||