republic of Ukraine 2006
The year 2006 witnessed an increase in
crime motivated by racial hatred, and a commensurate rise in antisemitic
attacks and attempted attacks. Jews were stabbed and beaten, and Holocaust
memorials and synagogues desecrated. Some antisemites gained seats in the
Ukrainian parliament in the March general election.
Jewish Community
According to the 2001 population census,
there were 103,600 Jews in Ukraine; however, data of local Jewish organizations
indicate the number of Jews to be 200,000−400,000. All-Ukrainian umbrella
Jewish organizations include the Vaad of Ukraine (Association of Jewish
Organizations and Communities), Jewish Confederation of Ukraine, All-Ukrainian
Jewish Congress, Association of Jewish Religious Organizations of Ukraine, Jewish
Council of Ukraine, Jewish Foundation of Ukraine, Federation of Jewish
Communities of Ukraine (Chabad), Religious Union of Communities of Progressive
Judaism and Midreshet Jerushalaim (a local branch of the Movement of
Conservative Judaism).
The Jewish Agency and the
Joint are very active in Ukraine. Charity (Khesed) organizations, supported by
the Joint, operate in tens of cities and some west Ukrainian cities have their
own charities. Schools, Sunday schools, kindergartens, yeshivas, ulpans and
children’s’ summer camps are supported by the Or Avner fund. There are also pedagogic
institutes: the International Solomon University in Kiev (with a branch in
Kharkov) and Beit Khana women’s college in Dnepropetrovsk, as well as the
Institute of Jewish Studies in Kiev, the Center for Jewish Studies in the
National University of the Kiev-Mohyla Academy, the Department of History and
Culture of the Jewish People at the Kuras
Institute of Political and Ethnic Studies in the
National Academy of Science, the Ukrainian Center for Holocaust Studies and the
religious Jewish University in Odessa. Ukrainian Jewry publish several
newspapers, including the Jewish Observer (Jewish Confederation of
Ukraine), Hadashot (Vaad of Ukraine), VEK (All-Ukrainian Jewish
Congress) and the literary almanac Yehupets; most large provincial
communities have their own newspapers, too.
Political background
Elections to the Ukrainian parliament
(Verkhovna Rada) were held in March 2006. Following lengthy negotiations
between the elected parties, a parliamentary majority was formed by the Party
of Regions (PR, 32.14 percent of the votes), the Socialist Party (5.69 percent)
and the Communist Party of Ukraine (3.66 percent). Viktor Ianukovich, leader of
PR, became prime minister. Two other political parties that gained seats in the
Verkhovna Rada were the Iulia Tymoshenko Bloc (BIuT, 22.29 percent) and the Our
Ukraine (to which President Viktor Iushenko’s party, Our Ukraine, belongs -
13.95 percent).
Also participating in the
elections were some parties with an antisemitic agenda, including the Ukrainian
Conservative Party (UKP) headed by the president
of MAUP (see below), Georgii Shchokin, and the All-Ukrainian Union Svoboda
(Freedom) headed by Oleg Tiagnybok; both leaders are known for their antisemitic
statements.
The UKP platform urged a
struggle against Zionism and giving priority to Ukrainians in all governmental
structures; Svoboda called for proportional representation of ethnic groups. Although
the UKP agenda provoked a debate among members of the Central Elections
Committee, the party was not banned from participating and anti-Jewish rhetoric
became a key element of its campaign, including of its leaders. At least half
of its newspaper Za Ukrainskuiu Ukrainu, distributed free around the
country during the campaign, was devoted to antisemitic content. In early March,
at a meeting of the Forum of National Patriotic Forces in Kherson, UKP leader Georgii
Shchokin accused the Jews of robbing the country and seizing power in Ukraine. He urged banning the activity of organized Jewry in the country.
The results of the elections
to the Verkhovna Rada showed that the overall majority of the population was not
prepared to support antisemites and extreme nationalists: UKP received only
0.09 percent of the vote and Svoboda 0.36 percent. However, in the western
regions Svoboda was more successful in local elections: in Lvov, for example,
it received 4.91 percent of the regional council vote.
Although, the
parliamentary elections demonstrated that political antisemitism in Ukraine is not a serious phenomenon, individual politicians who expressed antisemitic views
during the campaign as well as previously, succeeded in gaining seats in the
Verkhovna Rada. The ‘patriarch’ of the Ukrainian nationalist movement, Levko
Lukianenko, won a seat as a member of the above mentioned BIuT. A few months prior
to the elections he stated that the Zionists (Jews) were supporting the State
of Israel and sought to dominate the countries in which they lived. He recommended
checking the nationality of the Ukrainian president’s advisors and exposing the
plot of Jewish ownership of the mass media, whose organs were deliberately and systematically
conducting an informational war against the Ukrainian nation. Although Lukianenko’s
antisemitic views were probably not the reason for his acceptance to BIuT, they
did not prevent him from gaining high office within it.
Antisemitic activities
Antisemitism in Ukraine should be examined in
the context of the general attitude toward national minorities in the country.
The year 2006 witnessed an increase in crime motivated by ethnic hatred. In the
larger cities (Kiev, Kharkov, Dnepropetrovsk and Simferopol) skinhead groups
became more active and street attacks against national minorities were more
frequent. In the last three months of the year, three Africans were murdered in Kiev. The problem is even more serious in the Crimean region where there is a large Crimean
Tatar minority. In some areas, too, conflicts arose between different Christian
denominations and churches were torched. However,
the situation is better than in Russia, where tens of foreigners are murdered each
year; in Ukraine, street violence only increased markedly in late 2006.
Violent Incidents
In 2006 there was also an increase in the
number of attacks and attempted attacks on Jews. In Dnepropetrovsk an
identifiably Jewish man, Khaim Gobrov, 20, was severely stabbed and beaten on his
way from the Golden Rose Synagogue on 20 April, Hitler’s birthday. A few days
earlier four Jewish youths had been attacked by a group of skinheads in the city’s
main square.
On 16 December, a group of
youths shouting antisemitic insults such as “Kikes, get out of here” beat three
religious Jews near a synagogue in Kiev. Two of the victims managed to escape
and called the police but they were told to call again the next day. Meanwhile,
the third Jew was severely injured and a passerby who tried to intervene was
also hurt. The police arrived the next day and began an investigation.
Also in Kiev, a man came to
the Brodsky Synagogue on 3 February, and asked the guards to call the rabbi.
However, the guards noticed that he had a knife, stopped him and called the
police, who arrested him. At the station, the man, Gerogii Dobrianskii, said that
if he was sentenced to a year or two in prison, he would return to the
synagogue after his release. He was charged with planning to use a firearm and sentenced
to one year imprisonment.
Three men assaulted a Jewish
student, Azaria Menaker, at the Kiev metro on 5 March. He tried to defend
himself with a BB (air) gun, which he had bought and registered after he and
another student, Mordekhai Molozhenov, had been attacked in August 2005 (see ASW 2005). One
of the perpetrators was injured and the other two were arrested.
Fans of an Israeli team that
played a football match on 14 September against a local Odessa team were beaten
up after the game. On 18 September 24-year-old Haim Weitzman was beaten by a
group of youths shouting “I don’t like Jews” in the center of Odessa.
On 22 March several youths near
the Brodsky synagogue in Kiev stopped a young man who was approaching and insulted
him with antisemitic remarks. They also urged passersby to “stab and annihilate
the Yids.” One of the attackers was arrested. He told the police that he had
become acquainted with the others during a skinhead gathering and that they had
read a lot of antisemitic literature which they bought at book kiosks at the
city. He was released because he is a minor.
Many memorials to Holocaust
Jewish victims were desecrated in Ukraine. On 21 February paint was spilled on
a memorial to Holocaust victims in Feodosia and “Heil Hitler” written on the
memorial’s plaque. On a nearby bus station the perpetrators had painted “Beat
the Yids, Save Russia.” On 23 March a memorial in Sevastopol was
desecrated with slogans such as “Adolf Lives,” “Skinheads,” “White Power,” “Glory
to Russia,” “Nazi” and “88 [Heil Hitler].” A suspect who had left his e-mail
address on the memorial was arrested. The same memorial was painted with pink
swastikas on 18 June. On 20 April (Hitler’s birthday), swastikas and “6,000,000
lies” were painted on a memorial in Odessa to 12,000 local Jews murdered during
the Holocaust.
On 16 July the memorial to
Holocaust victims at Babi Yar was damaged and swastikas were painted on a
nearby building. A 23-year-old arrested for robbery on 31 October admitted during
the interrogation to having desecrated the memorial. In addition, the Holocaust
memorial in Pogrebishche was broken in early October; white paint was spilled
on a menorah, part of a Holocaust memorial in Lvov in November; a Holocaust
memorial in Donetsk was desecrated with swastikas and the SS sign on 20
December, the eve of its official unveiling; and on 31 December a plaque,
commemorating Jews murdered by the Nazis in 1941 in Kharkov, was broken and a swastika painted on it.
Synagogues throughout Ukraine were stoned and/or desecrated with antisemitic graffiti. On 14 February, an
antisemitic leaflet reading: “Chabad is the road to hell! No to Judeo-fascism...
Today our children do not go to the theater [after the Soviet regime
confiscated the building it served as a puppet theater]. Tomorrow they will
grab a gun and carry out a pogrom” and demanding its return to the theater
company, was glued on the door of the Central Brodsky Synagogue in Kiev. The leaflet contained the logo of the city branch of the Reform and Order Party
(PRP). A similar but even more virulent letter with the signature of the head
of the branch, Vladimir Bondarenko, was also mailed to the synagogue. PRP took
part in the elections (both parliamentary and regional) as part of the PORA-PRP
bloc. Antisemitic graffiti signed by PORA also appeared at the Kiev-Mohyla Academy of the National University. However, the bloc released a statement
condemning the graffiti and dissociating itself from it.
On 14 February, the canard “We
will slaughter you like pigs” was painted on the fence of a synagogue in Lvov. The slogans “Death to the kikes,” “Ukraine for Ukrainians” and “Whites Forward” appeared
in several places in the city. On 17 April and 23 June stones were thrown at
the windows of the Choral Synagogue in Kirovograd, and on 1 May at the synagogue
of the Ner Tamid congregation of Progressive Judaism in Simferopol. On 11 May a
man shouting antisemitic slogans tried to carve a swastika with an axe at the
entrance to a synagogue in Dnepropetrovsk. He fled when he saw the guard
approaching. In early May swastikas were painted on the synagogue in Zhitomir; on 27 July the words “Allah Akbar” were painted on its wall and on 22 September
it was stoned. “Death to the Yids,” “Jews Must Die” (with spelling mistakes), a
swastika, a crossed out Star of David and gallows were painted on a fence
surrounding the ruins of a 16th century synagogue in Lvov on 27 October.
Jewish cemeteries were desecrated
in May in Berdichev and near Zhitomir. In June two pupils, 16 and 14, were
arrested and admitted to desecrating the latter cemetery; on 19 October, 18
tombstones were broken at the Jewish cemetery in Glukhov.
Propaganda
Antisemitic graffiti also appeared in the
streets. In early June a Star of David on gallows and “Juden Kaput! Don’t Stop
Hooligans” were painted at the underground passage in Kiev. On 31 July
antisemitic graffiti such as “Palestine for Arabs, Yids − Babi Yar,” was
painted on a fence of a building of the State Committee for Material Reserves
in Dnepropetrovsk. The local Jewish community thinks that this was a response
to an earlier pro-Israel demonstration held in the city. In October “Spit Here,”
a Star of David and a crescent were painted on a building in Simferopol.
There was only a slight
increase in the publication of antisemitic articles in 2006, despite it being
an election year: 670 compared to 661 in 2005. The previous five years had witnessed a sharp progressive increase. Moreover, the proportion of antisemitic
articles published in the first quarter of the year (i.e., the period of the
election campaign) was no greater than that issued during the
rest of the year. Since the great majority of printed antisemitic materials
(newspapers, books, etc.) in Ukraine emanate from one establishment – MAUP (Inter-Regional
Academy of Personnel Management − see General
Analysis 2005), it might be concluded that MAUP has reached the limit of
its capabilities, at least financially, in this endeavor.
MAUP authors call in their
articles and books for a struggle against Zionism, which they identify with
Nazism and consider a threat to the entire world; the aim of the Jews in
Ukraine, and particularly of the Chabad organization, they claim, is to
destabilize the country, while the goal of the Jewish nation is to rule the
world and destroy all existing nations. Antisemitic articles appear in almost
all issues of Personal and other newspapers and periodicals published by
MAUP. For example, in issue no. 16 (19−25 April), Personal Plus contained
an article headed “Was it Ritual Murder in Kiev?” implying that the Jews had participated
in the murder of a pupil in the Podolsk area of Kiev for religious purposes and
committed similar crimes in Russia.
MAUP also holds antisemitic
conferences. In May, antisemitic and anti-Israel statements were made by
participants at a conference attended by MAUP leaders, Ukrainian public figures
and representatives from Arab countries. MAUP leaders accused "Rothschild
soldiers" of genocide of the Ukrainian people.
On 19 October, David Duke, former leader of American Ku Klux Klan, lectured at a
MAUP discussion club in Kiev. He presented the Russian edition of his book, The
Jewish Question through the Eyes of an American. My Research on Zionism,
spoke about the Klan and urged Ukrainians to cooperate with his organization,
the National Association for the
Advancement of White People.
Since June 2006 MAUP has
been selling its antisemitic newspapers and journals in several post offices in
Kiev and at numerous book kiosks. In November it was discovered that antisemitic
literature, such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as well as MAUP’s
newspapers, were available at the store inside the Ukrainian parliament. MP
Alexander Feldman asked for an investigation and all antisemitic publications
were confiscated. Also in November the west Ukrainian newspaper Za Vilnu
Ukrainu began serializing the book Adolf Hitler, the Founder of Israel, by Heneke Kardel, which claims that Hitler and his staff were Jews who launched
World War II and the Holocaust.
On 15 February, the
antisemitic monthly Idealist, issued
by a virtual movement of the same name, published a “List of 330 Yids at the
Ukrainian Parliament.” Beside each name was a Star of David, which the author
explained indicated that they were either Jews or married to Jews. He adds: “Where
there are no people − there are no problems. So, if the Yids disappear −
the Yid problem will disappear too.”
In August, The Yids’
Occupation of Ukraine, by Mikhail Garashchuk, went on sale in several
cities in Ukraine; it contains antisemitic text and caricatures, including a Star
of David on a gallows.
Responses to Antisemitism
As in previous years, there was much rhetoric
condemning antisemitism in general and MAUP in particular. In January, then Foreign
Minister Boris Tarasiuk said on national TV that MAUP’s antisemitic activity was
“unlawful and wrong” and that there was no place for antisemitism or any other
form of racism in Ukraine. In early August, Assistant Prosecutor General
Tatiana Korniakova stated during a press conference that the prosecutor’s
office intended to conduct a thorough investigation of MAUP’s publications.
On 18 October President
Viktor Iushchenko promised at a meeting with rabbis from the Federation of
Jewish Communities in Ukraine that the authorities were committed to the
struggle against antisemitism. Nevertheless, he signed a decree in favor of recognizing
Ukrainian nationalist fighters during World War II as war veterans. These soldiers
fought both against the Soviets and the Nazis and some of them took part in the
murder of Jews. About a month later he told the press that he had instructed
the prosecutor’s office and the Ukrainian Security Services to investigate the
involvement of MAUP in inciting xenophobia.
Nevertheless, all attempts
in 2006 (as in previous years) to influence the prosecutor’s office and other
authorities to take action against MAUP were unsuccessful. A great part of this
failure is due to Ukraine law. The authorities can only use the Law on Printed
Mass Media, to stop the dissemination of ethnic hatred. However, according to
another law, the accused in such a case must face a trial. Article 161 of the
Ukrainian Criminal Code (“Dissemination of ethnic, racist or religious enmity
and hatred”) contains the words “intentional actions,” i.e., intention to
disseminate ethnic hatred must be proven during a trial, the accused must be
convicted and only then can something be done. To prove intention in such cases
is practically impossible.
In June the education minister
closed seven branches of MAUP and in October, revoked 4,655 graduate diplomas;
however, the official reason given was “administrative irregularities” without
reference to MAUP’s antisemitic activity. A month later MAUP appealed the first
decision and the licenses of these branches were renewed.
The Ukrainian media usually
ignore antisemitic attacks and most of the incidents mentioned above were not reported
on national TV or radio or in the press. In May Ukrainian Jewish leaders called
on the authorities to ensure the safety of Jewish citizens and respond more effectively
to antisemitic manifestations. However, local authorities and the police tend to
classify antisemitic incidents as hooliganism and some local authorities even
deny the existence of neo-Nazis and skinheads in their regions.