HUNGARY 2003-4
Antisemitism
in Hungary in 2003 was manifested mainly in far right
publications and demonstrations. Istvan Csurka, of the Hungarian Justice and
Life Party, was a leading purveyor of antisemitic and anti-Israel commentary.
THE
JEWISH COMMUNITY
The
80,000 Jews living in Hungary, out of a total population of 10.55 million
constitute the largest Jewish community in eastern Europe outside the borders
of the former Soviet Union. The great majority live in Budapest, with
communities also in Miskolc and Debrecen as well as in smaller cities.
The Federation of Jewish Communities (Mazsihisz) is the main
body of Hungarian Jewry. Several major philanthropic organizations are active
in Hungary, especially the Lauder Foundation, whose summer camps attract youth
from across central and eastern Europe. The Hungarian Jewish Cultural
Association publishes a monthly, Szombat (Saturday), and conducts a wide
variety of cultural and educational activities. The quarterly Mult es Jovo
(Past and Present) publishes original and translated essays on a variety of
topics. The bi-weekly Uj Elet (New Life) is the official publication of
the Jewish community, and its content reflects a religious revival among some
segments of the Jewish population.
POLITICAL PARTIES AND EXTRA-PARLIAMENTARY
GROUPS
Political Parties
Since
its loss in the May 2002 elections, the center-right FIDESZ, which was the main
governing party before the elections, has been transforming itself into a
conservative bloc which seeks to topple the Socialist-led coalition. The
nationalist, xenophobic and antisemitic Hungarian Justice and Life Party
(MIEP), led by Istvan Csurka, has had no parliamentary representation since the
election. Attempts to challenge Csurka’s leadership have continued. While intra-party rivalry
might weaken the extremist camp, any wing of the party which claims to be the
‘true’ representative of the populist right has little chance of competing with
Csurka’s reputation and oratorical skills, which have dominated the extremist
camp in Hungary since 1992.
Extra-Parliamentary Groups
The
number of neo-Nazis is small, but they are visible at public demonstrations on
national days or anniversaries linked to World War II. The most notorious
neo-Nazi group is the Hungarian Welfare Association, which has appeared
under various names and in different guises and adheres openly to the legacy of
the Hungarian fascist Arrow Cross movement, led during the war by Ferenc
Szalasi. Various small groups, such as Blood & Honour, are active in
organizing demonstrations on anniversaries linked to World War II and the
legacy of Hungarian fascism.
Skinhead numbers have not increased in the last few years and
their activities appear to have diminished, evidenced by less activity in the
streets and fewer publications. Nevertheless, this violent sub-culture with its
neo-Nazi symbols continues to be a threat to public order. In February 2003,
Hungarian police confronted groups of local neo-Nazis, especially from Blood
& Honour, who were celebrating the anniversary of the 1945 attempt of
Hungarian and Nazi troops to break out of Soviet-besieged Budapest. A similar
demonstration took place in February 2004. Following these displays of neo-Nazi
power, the authorities promised to clamp down on such demonstrations. However,
the marches have become an annual display of neo-Nazism and Holocaust
revisionism, which has been criticized by liberals and leftists in the
Hungarian media. Thus, the liberal daily Nepszabadsag (21 Feb. 2003; translated and reprinted in TOL Wire – the web publication Transitions
Online) noted that in the absence of tougher hate speech laws, neo-Hungaricists
and neo-Arrow Cross supporters, “exercising their human rights,” have begun to
speak out and organize.
A neo-Nazi organization called Group for a Hungarian Future
(Magyar Jovo Csoport), which openly adheres to the legacy of the Arrow Cross
and its leader Szalasi, attracted media attention and served to spotlight the re-emergence
of other similar small groups which still draw dozens of adherents. The group
is led by 26-year-old Diana Bacsfi.
ANTISEMITIC AND RACIST ACTIVITIES
Antisemitism
in Hungary was manifested mainly in far right publications and demonstrations. MIEP
supporters continued their tradition of shouting antisemitic slogans and
tearing the US flag to shreds at their annual rallies in Budapest in March 2003
and 2004, commemorating the 1848–49
revolution. Further, during the anniversary demonstrations of both right and
left marking the 1956 uprising, antisemitic and anti-Israel slogans were heard
from the right, such as accusing Israel of war crimes. The center-right
traditionally keeps its distance from the right-wing demonstration, which was
led by Csurka.
On 11 January 2004 an Israeli flag was burned at a
demonstration organized by right-wing groups demanding the closure of an
alternative radio station, Tilos Radio. During a debate on Christian
values on this station, the talk show host had said that he would “wipe out all
Christians” (Ha'aretz, 12 Jan. 2004). This comment generated a heated public
discussion. It was alleged that Jews/Jewish-leftists were behind anti-Christian
expressions and that antisemitic manifestations were treated much more harshly than
anti-Christian hate speech (website of the daily Magyar Hirlap, as well
as sites of other major dailies). The radio station was banned temporarily by
the National Radio and TV Authority (BBC News, 21 Jan. 2004, 168 Ora, 22 Jan. 2004). Both the Hungarian Foreign Ministry and the Israeli embassy
condemned the burning of the Israeli flag. Those charged with the act appeared
to have acted spontaneously.
On 27 January 2004, marking Auschwitz Liberation Day,
the plaque on the bank of the Danube in Budapest in memory of
hundreds of Jews shot and dumped in the river by Hungarian Arrow Cross members
in late 1944, was defaced.
Propaganda
Hungary's
support for the US position in Iraq, an issue widely debated in the country,
was criticized by Csurka, who provided regular analyses in the weekly and
monthly Magyar Forum, in an attempt to prove complete Hungarian
servitude to foreign interests. In a characteristic remark, Csurka wrote in the
weekly Magyar Forum (20 Nov. 2003), that in “Hungary everything is
decided according to the interests of the global war-axis, Washington–Tel
Aviv.”
Such perceptions, shared by Hungarian populists and by the
extreme right, emphasize the Jewish-Israeli aspect of globalization, a favorite
theme of Csurka. Every issue of Magyar Forum contains articles
describing the pauperization of Hungary, allegedly a consequence not only of Hungary
joining the EU – a theme which lacks clear-cut antisemitic elements – but of
its subordination to US-Israeli global interests. This fits well with the
old-new conspiracy theories of Jewish control of world – and specifically Hungarian
– finances, also a frequent theme of Csurka’s column in Magyar Forum.
In early November 2003 the British Holocaust revisionist
David Irving appeared on the state-owned Hungarian TV station, invited by
Csurka to promote his book on the 1956 Hungarian Revolution which he portrayed as
a workers' uprising against a Jewish-dominated communist regime (see Balint
Molnar, “Drawing Red Lines,” TOL, 9 Jan. 2004). The show in which he
appeared, “Night Shelter,” is known for its right-wing tendencies. Following a
public outcry, the program was taken off the air, prompting Csurka to attack
‘leftist’ control of the media. Csurka referred to David Irving, as a
“prominent British historian” whose views were not tolerated in Hungary and
other countries by “Holocaust industrialists” (Magyar Forum, 20 Nov. 2003).
The nationalist weekly Magyar Demokrata is also a
regular forum for the publication of antisemitic, anti-Israel and anti-Zionist
articles. Articles dealing with the size and impact of Israeli-Jewish financial
interests in Hungary are published in almost every issue. Such themes are
combined with a negative approach toward the EU.
In late 2003 the verdict against Lorant Hegedus, a Reformist Church
minister and leading MIEP member, who headed the party list for the 2004
European Parliament elections, was annulled. In 2002 Hegedus had published an
article in a Budapest district paper in which he called for the elimination of
the “Galician hordes” (a euphemism for the thousands of Ostjuden, east European
Jewish refugees from Galicia who flocked to Hungary in the late 19th century
seeking a better life) from Hungarian public life (see ASW 2002/3).
Hegedus had been given a suspended 18-month jail sentence for “inciting hatred
against a community.” The ‘victory of free speech’ was hailed by the Hungarian
right, and he became an instant hero of the MIEP, as well as of the
conservative right (from FIDESZ rightwards). Some eighty-four intellectuals signed
a letter condemning the repeal (TOL, 9 Jan. 2004). Such protests on the part of liberals were strongly criticized by Csurka, who called for combating
attempts by the Federation of Jewish Communities to lead a revolt “against the
Hungarian judiciary,” and branded them as “a group which has great influence
and tremendous wealth, seeks to.... create anarchy and works for complete
robbery of the Hungarian nation” (Magyar Forum, 20 Nov. 2003).