> >
Print

ARGENTINA 2002-3

 

No significant change was observed in the number of antisemitic events recorded in 2002. Apart from a few acts of a violent nature, the majority of antisemitic incidents in 2002 were manifested in wall slogans and graffiti, threats to individuals and to Jewish institutions, and notably, in utterances of official figures. While there seems to have been an aggravation of the latter trend, significant sectors of society and the state urge greater pluralism and reject antisemitism as “politically incorrect.”

THE JEWISH COMMUNITY

The Jewish population of Argentina of about 180,000, out of a total population of 37 million has been declining since the 1960s. Some 80 percent live in the city of Buenos Aires and the Greater Buenos Aires area. Cities with a large Jewish presence include Rosario, Córdoba, San Miguel de Tucumán, Mendoza, Bahía Blanca, La Plata and Santa Fe.

The Jewish community maintains many educational, cultural and religious institutions, including a Hebrew and a Yiddish press, publishing houses and an educational system from kindergarten through university. The leading Jewish organization is DAIA (Delegación de Asociaciones Israelitas Argentinas), which represents communities and organizations to the authorities and is responsible for safeguarding the rights of members. AMIA (Asociación Mutual Israelita Argentina) is the main community organization. The Vaad ha-Kehilot is the umbrella organization of all the communities in the provinces.

The pauperization of Argentina’s middle classes as a result of the collapse of the country’s economy had a direct impact on a significant portion of the Jewish community. Social welfare organizations have been hard-pressed and there has been a steep rise in applications for aliya to Israel and for emigration to other parts of the world (see also ASW 2001/2).

extremist organizations

A number of extremist organizations and publications profess antisemitism. However, their following is small and they have little impact on the majority of citizens. Moreover, neither Alejandro Biondini nor Alejandro Franze, the leading far right figures, can be compared to Jean-Marie Le Pen in France or Jörg Haider in Austria, as they and their groups have not attained the popular support or national organizational level of the extreme right European parties.

Partido Nuevo Orden Social Patriótico (New Social Patriotic Order Party – PNOSP) and Partido Nuevo Triunfo (New Triumph Party – PNT) are the chief antisemitic organizations. According to observers, neither the PNT nor the PNOSP has a following of more than 300 throughout the country. Both parties hold conspiratorial notions about the Jewish presence in Argentina, largely derived from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

In mid-2002, PNT leader Alejandro Biondini announced on his web page the formation of the Frente Nacional de la Argentina, made up of nationalists and Peronist admirers. In a November 2002 interview, Biondini said his political model was French far right leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, although, he added: “he is not exactly my ideal because I believe in domestic solutions.” Nevertheless, he pointed out, “Le Pen is an example for French nationalists and for true nationalists throughout the world.”

Principal motifs found in PNT communications media during 2002 included identification of the Simon Wiesenthal Center as “a foreign organization that wants to interfere in local politics [and is] devoid of any kind of moral authority”; repeated reprobation of several Jewish journalists; exaltation of Hitler’s and Mussolini’s leadership; and accusing the DAIA of “leading the persecution of the PNT.”

In mid-2002 a new ultra-right nationalist group, Comando Nacionalista Ricardo López Jordán, emerged – apparently named after a 19th century caudillo. In a press release the group announced that it had planted explosive devices in several foreign exchange banks. There was an explosion at the French Bank in the neighborhood of Abasto, but no one claimed responsibility and there was no concrete evidence that the group was involved.

ANTISEMITIC ACTIVITIES

No significant change was observed in the number of antisemitic events recorded in 2002, compared to the years 1999 to 2001. Apart from a few acts of a violent nature, the majority of antisemitic incidents in 2002 were manifested in wall slogans and graffiti, threats to individuals and to Jewish institutions, and utterances of official figures. The fact that most incidents occurred in the City of Buenos Aires and to a lesser extent in Greater Buenos Aires may be due to a greater tendency on the part of the population there to file complaints to DAIA’s Department of Legal Issues, which is seated in the capital, and to the importance that the national media ascribe to antisemitic events in this region.

            While DAIA received most of the complaints, some were also lodged at the National Institute against Discrimination, Xenophobia and Racism (INADI). A total of 149 incidents was recorded in 2002: 62 percent in Buenos Aires City, 13 percent in Greater Buenos Aires, 13 percent in other provinces and 12 percent unspecified. Physical assault on individuals, vandalism of Jewish institutions and cemetery desecration made up 9 percent of the total; the rest comprised various forms of antisemitic expression (including utterances by executive, military and Church officials, anonymous threats to individuals and institutions and graffiti) and discrimination.

Antisemitic slogans and graffiti in the streets of Buenos Aires and other cities were among the most prevalent type of antisemitism. Examples included: “Defend human rights. Kill a Jew”; and “The country is in ruins, the Jews are getting rich.” Much of the graffiti was adorned with swastikas.

There appear to be two tendencies: on the one hand, aggravation of antisemitic expressions, especially by leading officials or other representatives of the public; on the other, significant sectors of society and the government urge greater pluralism, rejecting antisemitism in all its forms and encouraging the full integration of Jews in society. The latter trend, presenting antisemitism as “politically incorrect,” strengthened after the terrorist attacks on the Israeli embassy (1992) and the AMIA Jewish community center (1994).

 

Violence, Vandalism and Threats

One of the most violent incidents was the abduction of a Jewish citizen. Although the motive was to obtain ransom from his family, his captors abused him with antisemitic insults and cut off one of his fingers. In addition, some tombs in the Jewish cemetery of Berazategui were damaged in January 2002; a red light bulb was thrown at a Jewish institution in August; and an anti-tank grenade, together with an antisemitic leaflet, was found in November in front of the Max Nordeau Cultural Center in La Plata.

Throughout the year many prominent Jewish persons and institutions received threatening phone calls and mail, as well as in-your-face insults. The president of the Central Bank, Mario Blejer, received antisemitic threats in May. Members of the community, too, were the targets of threats or verbal abuse, such as the Jewish employer assailed by her employee in December with the words: “How wonderful that Hitler killed so many Jews!” Reminders of the Jewish fate in the Holocaust were expressed in many of these messages.

 

Discrimination and Antisemitic Expressions

On 11 July 2002, the Official Bulletin published Decree 1223/02, “Designation of a special representative for subjects related to the Jewish community in civilian affairs.” After the decree had been proposed by Foreign Affairs Minister Dr. Carlos Ruckauf, the government appointed Saúl Rotsztain as honorary ambassador, creating a de facto liaison function with the national and international Jewish community. Jewish community representatives immediately appealed to the president to abrogate the decree on the grounds that it was discriminatory, and because neither the Jewish community nor any other community required an intermediary of this kind. Moreover, they protested, in Argentina, a racially mixed country, it was apparently only the Jews who needed to prove their national “innocence” and “loyalty,” and required a special envoy to deal with their issues as if they were foreigners. The decree was subsequently cancelled.

A clear intention to discriminate against Jews was expressed by Monsignor Luis Héctor Villalba, archbishop of the province of Tucumán. Referring to the upcoming elections in the province, the archbishop proposed on a TV discussion program that in regard to the future governor’s religious faith, the articles of the Tucumán Constitution should be enforced “at any cost.” Article 80 of the constitution states that the governor-elect and the vice-governor must swear by “God, the Country and the Holy Gospels.” If the archbishop’s proposal were to be accepted by the electoral council, Justicialist Party Senator José Alperovich, a Jewish candidate, could not have been sworn in. After intervention by the DAIA and other institutions such as INADI, the First Arbitration Court ordered the Electoral Council not to apply the confessional clause.

                Inquiries into human rights violations during the military dictatorship (1976–83) provoked some strong antisemitic reactions. Army chief-of-staff General Ricardo Brinzoni is among those being investigated and is represented by Dr. Enrique Torres Bande, the legal representative of Biondini’s neo-Nazi and antisemitic PNT. (For more information, see “The Brinzoni Case,” in Marisa Braylan, Adrián Jmelnizky, Report on Antisemitism in Argentina 2000/2001, CES, DAIA). Brinzoni had invited journalist Héctor Timerman, together with other public personalities, to speak at a series of conferences on the mass media, attended by heads of press and communications as well as liaison officers from every army unit. Timerman, the son of the late journalist and director of La Opinión, Jacobo Timerman – who was kidnapped and given special torture treatment because he was Jewish during the military dictatorship – requested as a precondition for his attendance at the conference, that the army chief accompany him to his parents’ grave and apologize. Brinzoni’s response was a well-known antisemitic quotation from The Merchant of Venice. Many groups, including INADI and Madres de Plaza de Mayo, deplored Brinzoni’s reaction and condemned him for contempt of justice and democracy.

TV and radio shows featured antisemitic stereotyping. One of the participants on a TV program, broadcast on the national Azul Channel on 4 July, said: “There are people that have no sentiments in their soul, like the Jews who go through the world thinking only how to make money.”

During the IV Catholic Book Fair held in La Plata (Buenos Aires Province) from 28 October to 11 November 2002, and sponsored by the archbishopric of La Plata, the book El Kahal Oro, written circa 1935 by Gustavo Martínez Zuviría was exhibited for sale. This work, written under the pen name Hugo Wast, speaks of the Argentinean Jewish community and its assumed relationship with money. A typical extract from the book reads: “… the Kahal [members of the community... precursor of the Antichrist… is the reason why, everywhere, the cry… ‘Death to Jews!’ has become synonymous with ‘Long live our country!’” The book provoked protests from the Jewish community and the City Council of La Plata, which lodged a complaint. The organizers of the fair supported sales of the book, arguing that its exclusion would constitute discrimination.

A number of extremist/nationalist publications published antisemitic content in 2002 (see also ASW 2001/2).

·        The monthly Catholic integralist Patria Argentina is the oldest (founded 1985) and most consistent in its antisemitism. In 2002 it discussed alleged Jewish domination of US political and economic power and the Jews’ “utilization” of the Holocaust to justify crimes of any kind.

·        El Fortín, which is linked to the fascist Evolean study center (Centro de Estudios Evolianos y de la Concentración Nacionalista Argentina) through its editor Marcos Ghio, repeated the canard alleging Jewish participation in the attacks of 11 September 2001 in order “to obtain more US support in the Middle East”; discredited the notion of the Nazis’ “Final Solution”; and claimed the existence of an organization called Zion Priority, allegedly a new version of The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

·        The traditional, nationalist Cabildo is distributed in the city of Buenos Aires and in Greater Buenos Aires, and has a website. Its antisemitism tends to be theologically based. During the year 2002 the periodical criticized the emigration of Argentinean Jews to Israel; accused Jews of “profaning the holy sacred place where the Savior of the World was born” (referring to the Israeli siege of the Church of the Nativity in May); sharply attacked political columnist and human rights activist Héctor Timerman in the affair involving army chief-of-staff Ricardo Brinzoni (see above); and cast doubt on the number of Jews who died in the Holocaust.

The antisemitic periodicals El Mosquito, El Ataque and Fuerza Nacional did not appear in 2002.

Responses to antisemitism

Legislation and Legal Activity

Serious doubt, bordering on the criminal, has been cast on the handling of more than twenty files by the national Supreme Court of Justice following an investigation by the Political Justice Commission. One of the most significant cases mentioned by the commission is the delay of the Supreme Court proceedings investigating the 1992 attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires.

The National Executive Power, through Decree No. 1279/97, has declared that “the Internet service is considered to be included in the constitutional guarantee that protects freedom of speech, and thus is subject to the same considerations granted to other social mass media.” However, the anti-discrimination law can be applied to the Internet since it punishes “those who take part in an organization or create publicity based upon ideas or theories of superiority of a race or of a group of a specific religion, ethnic origin or color, with the purpose of justifying or promoting racial or religious discrimination in any way.” An attempt to restrict content of the web is draft law 25690 published in the Official Bulletin on 3 January 2003.

Following a retrial of the case involving three neo-Nazi skinheads convicted of assaulting a young man because they thought he was Jewish (see ASW 1999/2000, 2001/2), the higher criminal court confirmed the sentence against two of the three accused. Some months previously, the third accused, Andrés Paszkowski, had surrendered to the authorities and was immediately imprisoned.

 

The AMIA Investigation

The oral public proceedings investigating the 1994 terrorist attack on the AMIA building began on 24 September 2001 (see ASW 2001/2). During 2002, the first of three steps – reconstructing the event – stipulated by the three federal judges forming the tribunal was completed. Following testimony by 800 witnesses, it was confirmed that a car bomb had been used to cause the explosion.

The two remaining trial steps are to investigate extortion by members of the Buenos Aires police force and the process of preparation and final delivery of the vehicle to perpetrate the attack. There are five accused: a civilian (Carlos Alberto Telleldín) and four ex policemen of the province of Buenos Aires (Juan José Ribelli, Mario Norberto Bareiro, Anastacio Irineo Leal and Raúl Edilio Ibarra).

 

Public Activity

The impact of tensions arising from the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in 2002 did not appear to affect relations between Argentina’s Arab and Muslim communities and the Jewish community, as they did in Europe. Representatives of both communities (DAIA and FEARAB) have made several joint declarations, one of them explicitly referring to the desire to reach a peaceful solution in the Middle East.

During the year 2002, the DAIA was active in combating antisemitism on various fronts. It was successful in having the group Hitler, Christ and Me excluded from a scheduled appearance at a rock festival in the province of Buenos Aires.

Following a soccer game between the Atlanta and All Boys teams, during which antisemitic chants were heard and a flag with an antisemitic emblem was exhibited, the DAIA demanded that the Argentine Football Association punish those responsible and propose a regulation in that regard. The All Boys authorities issued an apology to the DAIA and promised to publicize it.

Representatives of the Jewish community, together with other educational and religious communities (FEARAB, Armenian Apostolic Church, the Episcopal Vicariate) protested a draft law drawn up by the city of Buenos Aires legislature declaring secondary studies as mandatory but allotting a subsidy only to public schools for this purpose. As a consequence, the law was modified to embrace all secondary schools in the education system.

The Argentine Lutheran Church issued a declaration to the Jewish community for the first time condemning the persecution suffered by the Jewish people throughout history and antisemitism. It repudiated discriminatory texts in the doctrines of their founder Martin Luther, and regretted the harmful effects they had had on the generations that followed. As a result of this initiative, the DAIA organized a joint event with the Lutheran Church.

The DAIA promoted several events in the province of Córdoba as part of its effort to combat racism and antisemitism. The provincial legislature organized a meeting to commemorate the victims of the AMIA bombing and published a unanimous resolution paying tribute to the victims.